<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Sharing at Work - Latest Comments in Spotlight on London's Wiki Wednesday - Attitudes Towards Sharepoint </title><link>http://sharingatwork.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 11:17:55 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Spotlight on London's Wiki Wednesday - Attitudes Towards Sharepoint </title><link>http://www.sharingatwork.com/2008/10/spotlight-on-londons-wiki-wednesday.html#comment-2879610</link><description>Quite right!  I was pretty excited about setting up a MediaWiki server for testing at the office but I've mostly abandoned that project because our Sharepoint server has a limited wiki functionality.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I got the impression that MediaWiki's MySQL backend would be a tough sell to our IT department and Sharepoint would be easy to get approved.  Now I'm left to figure out how to customize/enhance Sharepoint's wiki to provide more features than it does out of the box.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dpritchett</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 11:17:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Spotlight on London's Wiki Wednesday - Attitudes Towards Sharepoint </title><link>http://www.sharingatwork.com/2008/10/spotlight-on-londons-wiki-wednesday.html#comment-2877022</link><description>sharepoint is not a wiki. It is semistructured knwoledge collaboration portal,- with a possible plugin for wiki functionality. In general people think the wiki-functionality is too limited for practical use.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lex Slaghuis</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 03:07:56 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>